How HA Injections Can Delay Knee Replacement Surgery

Key Research Findings

Large population studies show that hyaluronic acid (HA) knee injections significantly delay the need for total knee replacement (TKR):

Altman et al. (2015): Patients receiving HA delayed TKR by 0.7 to 3.6 years compared to non-HA users
Korean Study (2024): 39% lower hazard of progressing to TKR with HA therapy
Each additional HA course further extends time before surgery is needed
Benefits include preserved natural joint function, avoided surgical risks, and substantial cost savings

The Evidence for Surgery Delay

Landmark U.S. Study: 182,000+ Patients

One of the most compelling pieces of evidence comes from a large U.S. claims database study by Altman et al. published in 2015:^[1]

Study Details:

182,000+ knee OA patients who eventually underwent TKR
Compared time from diagnosis to surgery based on HA use

Findings:

Patient Group	Median Time to TKR
No HA injections	0.7 years
≥1 HA series	1.4 years
≥3 HA courses	2.3 years
≥5 HA courses	3.6 years

Key insight: Each course of HA therapy progressively extended the time before knee replacement was needed.

Korean Study: 36,000+ Patients

A 2024 Korean population study confirmed these findings in a different healthcare system:^[2]

36,000+ patients aged 50 and older with knee OA
Patients receiving HA had 39% lower hazard of progressing to TKR (HR ~0.61)
Approximately 1 year longer without TKR after adjusting for confounders
Risk of needing surgery decreased progressively with each HA cycle

Why Does This Matter?

The Reality of Knee Replacement

Total knee replacement is a major surgery with significant implications:

Factor	Impact
Cost	$30,000-$50,000+
Hospital stay	1-3 days
Recovery time	3-6 months for full recovery
Surgical risks	Infection, blood clots, anesthesia complications
Revision risk	10-15% may need revision within 20 years
Activity limitations	Some high-impact activities permanently limited

The Value of Delay

Every year that knee replacement can be safely postponed provides benefits:

Preserved natural joint - Your own knee, functioning longer

Avoided surgical risks - No anesthesia, infection, or clot risk

Reduced revision likelihood - Younger patients face higher revision rates

Technology advancement - Implants and techniques improve over time

Quality years preserved - Active living without surgical recovery

The Cost-Effectiveness Argument

HA vs. Surgery Economics

Cost Comparison:

Treatment	Cost Range
Single TKR surgery	$30,000-$50,000+
Annual HA treatment series	$500-$1,500
5 years of HA treatment	$2,500-$7,500
Potential savings per patient	$22,500-$47,500

Every Year of Delay = Savings

Even if surgery becomes necessary eventually, each year of delay represents:

Avoided surgical costs for that year
No rehabilitation expenses
Preserved earning capacity (for working patients)
Reduced risk of surgical complications
Lower likelihood of needing revision surgery

Cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY)

Research has found HA injections have a cost-effectiveness ratio of approximately $5,332 per QALY—well below the typical threshold of $50,000-$100,000 that defines a cost-effective intervention.^[3]

Who Benefits Most from Surgery Delay?

Ideal Candidates

Early to moderate OA (Stages 1-3) - More cartilage remaining to benefit from HA

Patients under 65 - More years of potential benefit; higher revision risk if operated young

Those with surgical contraindications - Medical conditions making surgery risky

Patients preferring conservative care - Want to delay surgery as long as safely possible

Good HA responders - Those who’ve had relief from previous injections

Why Younger Patients Especially Benefit

For patients in their 50s and early 60s, delaying TKR is particularly important:

The Revision Problem:

Knee implants last 15-25 years on average
A 55-year-old receiving TKR will likely need revision surgery in their 70s
Revision surgery is more complex, costly, and has worse outcomes
Delaying the first surgery may mean avoiding revision altogether

How HA Enables Delay

The Mechanism

HA injections don’t just mask pain—they address the underlying joint dysfunction:

Restore lubrication - Replenish synovial fluid viscosity
Reduce friction - Decrease bone-on-bone grinding
Modulate inflammation - Anti-inflammatory effects at the joint level
Protect cartilage - May slow further cartilage breakdown
Enable activity - Reduced pain allows continued exercise and PT

Synergy with Conservative Care

HA works best as part of a comprehensive approach:

Physical therapy - Strengthens supporting muscles
Weight management - Reduces joint stress
Activity modification - Avoids damaging activities
Appropriate exercise - Maintains mobility and fitness
HA injections - Provides the pain relief to do all the above

What the Guidelines Don’t Tell You

The Nuance of “Not Recommended”

Some guidelines give HA a lukewarm recommendation (e.g., “not for routine use”). What they actually mean:

What Guidelines Say vs. What They Mean:

Guideline Language	Translation
”Not for routine use”	Use selectively in appropriate patients
”Conditional recommendation against”	Benefits and risks are close; clinical judgment applies
”Inconclusive evidence”	Studies exist, but heterogeneous; doesn’t mean ineffective

No authoritative guideline prohibits HA use. They advise judicious use—exactly what real-world data supports.

Real-World vs. Clinical Trials

Large database studies often show more benefit than clinical trials because:

They capture cumulative effects over years
They reflect real patient selection (those likely to respond)
They measure meaningful outcomes (TKR delay) not just pain scores

Practical Considerations

When to Start HA for Maximum Delay

Earlier stages benefit most - Start when conservative care alone is insufficient

Don’t wait for severe OA - Advanced disease responds less well

Repeat courses as needed - Medicare allows every 6+ months if effective

The Decision Conversation

When discussing TKR timing with your surgeon, consider asking:

“Can we try HA injections to delay surgery?”
“What stage is my OA—am I a good candidate for HA?”
“If HA helps, how long might I be able to postpone surgery?”
“What are the risks of waiting vs. operating now?”
“Does delaying surgery affect long-term outcomes?”

What About Very Advanced OA?

When Delay May Not Be Appropriate

HA injections are less effective—and surgery delay less advisable—in certain situations:

Bone-on-bone arthritis (Stage 4) - Limited cartilage for HA to lubricate

Severe joint deformity - Structural damage beyond what injections address

Instability requiring surgery - Mechanical issues needing repair

Failed conservative care comprehensively - All non-surgical options exhausted

In these cases, surgery may be the right choice—and delaying it could mean unnecessary suffering.

The Bottom Line

HA Injections as a Bridge Strategy

Large population studies demonstrate that HA injections can meaningfully delay knee replacement:

1-3+ years of additional time before surgery
Each additional course extends the delay further
Cost savings of tens of thousands of dollars
Quality years preserved with natural joint
Reduced surgical risk from avoiding or postponing surgery

For appropriate candidates, HA injections offer a valuable bridge—allowing patients to maintain function and quality of life while postponing the significant commitment of knee replacement surgery.

This isn’t about avoiding surgery forever. It’s about right-timing the surgery—operating when truly necessary, not before.

Explore Non-Surgical Options

Find providers who offer HA injections as part of a comprehensive knee OA management plan.

Imaging-Guided Medicare Accepted

Your Name

Email Address

ZIP Code

Used to find providers in your area

Primary Condition

Insurance Type

By checking this box, I consent to receive calls and text messages (including autodialed and prerecorded messages) from Joint Pain Authority and its partners at the phone number provided, regarding healthcare services and treatment options. I also consent to receive marketing communications and understand these may include promotional offers. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency varies. Reply STOP to opt out of texts. I understand this consent is not required to receive services. View full terms.

Required to submit this form

Your information is secure. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank You!

We've received your request. A provider specialist will contact you within 1-2 business days to help you find the right care.

What happens next?

1 We'll verify your insurance coverage
2 Match you with quality providers in your area
3 Contact you to discuss your options

Questions? Browse our guides:

How to Choose a Provider

References

Altman R, et al. Hyaluronic Acid Injections Are Associated with Delay of Total Knee Replacement Surgery in Patients with Knee OA. PLoS One, 2015;10(12):e0145776. Full Text
Park JG, et al. Association between IA hyaluronic acid injections and delaying total knee arthroplasty: analysis of 36,983 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2024;25:706.
Samuelson EM, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of PRP vs Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis. Arthroscopy, 2020;36(12):3072-78.
Comprehensive review of viscosupplementation. Orthopedic Reviews. Full Text
CMS LCD L39529 - Coverage requirements for repeat HA injections. Medicare Coverage Database

Surgery Alternatives Updates

Stay informed about non-surgical options for managing knee osteoarthritis.

Join 10,000+ readers. No spam.