NASHA Single Shot vs. Natural HA Series
Durolane and Orthovisc are both non-avian hyaluronic acid products produced via bacterial fermentation, making both safe for patients with avian allergies. Where they differ is in formulation and delivery: Durolane uses NASHA (Non-Animal Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid) cross-linking technology and delivers treatment in a single injection, while Orthovisc is non-cross-linked plain HA delivered over 3-4 weekly visits at a lower drug cost.
Quick Comparison Table
| Feature | Durolane | Orthovisc |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bioventus | Anika Therapeutics |
| Source | Bacterial fermentation (NASHA) | Bacterial fermentation |
| Bird allergy safe | Yes | Yes |
| Injections needed | 1 | 3-4 weekly |
| Volume per injection | 3 mL | 2 mL |
| Total volume | 3 mL | 6-8 mL |
| Cross-linked | Yes (stabilized) | No (native HA) |
| Molecular weight | High (NASHA) | High (1-2.9 million Da) |
| FDA approval | 2015 | 2004 |
| HCPCS Code | J7318 | J7324 |
| Duration | 6+ months | Up to 6 months |
| Self-pay cost | $900-$1,300 | $600-$1,000 |
What Is Durolane?
Durolane uses NASHA (Non-Animal Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid) technology, originally developed by Q-Med in Sweden. The HA is produced through bacterial fermentation and then minimally stabilized to create a gel that persists longer in the joint.
Durolane’s Unique Position
Durolane uses NASHA (Non-Animal Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid) technology, making it one of two non-avian single-injection options (the other being Monovisc). Its distinguishing feature is minimal cross-linking that stabilizes the HA gel to persist longer in the joint. Among single-injection products, Synvisc-One and Gel-One are avian-derived; Durolane and Monovisc are both non-avian.
Key Strengths
What Is Orthovisc?
Orthovisc contains ultra-pure, non-cross-linked sodium hyaluronate produced by Anika Therapeutics via bacterial fermentation (the same manufacturer as Monovisc). Its molecular weight of 1-2.9 million Daltons is achieved entirely through purification, not chemical modification.
Key Strengths
The Allergy Question
Both Are Safe for Patients With Avian Allergies
Both Durolane and Orthovisc are produced via bacterial fermentation with no animal-derived ingredients. Neither requires avian allergy screening.
If you have avian allergies and want a single-injection product, Durolane and Monovisc are both non-avian single-shot options.
Cross-Linked vs. Non-Cross-Linked
| Property | Durolane (Stabilized) | Orthovisc (Non-CL) |
|---|---|---|
| Processing | Minimal cross-linking | No cross-linking |
| Structure | Stabilized gel | Natural HA chains |
| Joint residence | Longer (designed to persist) | Shorter per dose |
| Reaction risk | Low | Lowest |
| Matches native HA | Partially | Closely |
Durolane’s NASHA stabilization is described as “minimal” cross-linking designed to make the HA gel persist longer without the higher reaction rates associated with heavily cross-linked products like Synvisc-One.
Cost Comparison
| Factor | Durolane | Orthovisc |
|---|---|---|
| Drug cost (self-pay) | $900-$1,300 | $600-$1,000 |
| Office visit copays | 1 | 3-4 |
| Total with Medicare | $100-$200 | $150-$300 |
| Total self-pay | $925-$1,350 | $675-$1,200 |
Insight: Orthovisc has a lower drug cost, but the multiple visit copays narrow the gap. With Medicare, the total cost is often similar.
Making Your Decision
Choose Durolane if:
- You want non-animal-derived HA with NASHA cross-linking technology
- You prefer single-visit convenience
- Potentially longer duration appeals to you
Choose Orthovisc if:
- You prefer non-cross-linked, natural HA
- You want more total HA volume (6-8 mL vs. 3 mL)
- You value the longer safety track record (20+ years)
- Lower drug cost is a priority
- You like Anika Therapeutics products (same maker as Monovisc)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which product is more effective?
Both provide similar clinical outcomes for knee OA pain relief. No head-to-head trial has shown clear superiority of either product.
Can I try Orthovisc first and switch to Durolane?
Yes. Switching between HA products is safe and may be helpful if one does not provide adequate relief.
Is Durolane really allergy-safe?
Yes. Durolane is produced entirely through bacterial fermentation with no animal-derived components. It has been tested and confirmed safe for patients with avian allergies.
Which is better for repeat treatments?
Both can be repeated every 6 months. Orthovisc’s non-cross-linked formulation may have a theoretical advantage for long-term repeated use due to lower reaction risk, but Durolane’s track record is also good.
The Bottom Line
Durolane is the go-to for patients who want single-injection convenience with NASHA cross-linking technology for longer-lasting relief. Both Durolane and Orthovisc are non-avian and safe for patients with avian allergies.
Orthovisc is the choice for patients who want non-cross-linked, natural HA with proven long-term safety and more total volume delivered at a lower drug cost.
Both are effective, Medicare-covered, non-avian options. Scheduling preference (single visit vs. series) and HA formulation (cross-linked vs. natural) are the main decision factors.
Find HA Injection Providers
Connect with specialists offering Durolane, Orthovisc, and other viscosupplementation options.
Your information is secure. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Thank You!
We've received your request. A provider specialist will contact you within 1-2 business days to help you find the right care.
What happens next?
- 1 We'll verify your insurance coverage
- 2 Match you with quality providers in your area
- 3 Contact you to discuss your options
Questions? Browse our guides:
How to Choose a ProviderRelated Comparisons
HA Treatment Comparisons
Stay informed about viscosupplementation options for knee osteoarthritis.
Join 10,000+ readers. No spam.